”Essay review of The Secret Gospel of Mark Unveiled, by Peter Jeffery”, Scott G. Brown (2007), Review of Biblical Literature 09

-
https://www.academia.edu/4605435/Essay_review_of_The_Secret_Gospel_of_Mark_Unveiled_by_Peter_Jeffery

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Papias and Clement and Mark's Two Gospels Terence Y. Mullins Vigiliae Christianae Vol. 30, No. 3 (Sep., 1976), pp. 189-192 (4 pages)

-
With the publication of the letter by Clement of Alexandria which Morton Smith discovered in the back of an early book/ the witness of Papias to Mark's Gospel has been somewhat clarified. I have shown that Papias, in the phrase where he actually defends Mark's writing, does not defend Mark against the charge of not writing an orderly account, but defends him against the charge that he should not have written "a few things as he remembered them".2 And this has to mean that he did not write many things from memory. Furthermore, the opening statement of Papias' testimony to Mark's Gospel may be interpreted as saying that Mark translated what Peter wrote. Putting this interpretation of the opening statement together with the necessary interpretation of Papias' defense of Mark produced an interpretation of Papias as saying that Mark translated what Peter had written and then, later, added a few things to that translation.3 That was as far as I could go at t...
Read more

Beyond Gnosticism [Myth, Lifestyle, and Society in the School of Valentinus ] Ismo Dunderberg, New York, Columbia University Press, 2008 p. 242 - 243

-
Irenaeus takes special note of Valentinian rituals because he can call upon them as proof for his case that Valentinians were different from "ordinary" Christians. Above all, he recounts a number of Valentinian views about "redemption" (apolutrosis). His account shows that the performance of redemption as a ritual was confined to some Valentinian groups. Their identity is debated, but I am inclined to believe that these groups belonged to the followers of Marcus. I follow the view that the entire second main part of book 1 of Irenaeus's Against Heresies (chapters 13-21) describes the views and practices of Marcus (13-16) and those of his followers (17-21). For this understanding of Irenaeus Heresies (chapters 13-21) describes the views and practices of Marcus (13-16) and those of his followers (17-21). For this understanding of Irenaeus Her. 13-21, see, eg, the translation by Unger and Dillon; Fredrik Wisse, "The Nag Hammadi Library and the Heresiologists...
Read more

The Historical Life of Jesus, John Dominic Crossan (New York: Harper Collins, 1991) p 415 - 416

-
My theory, then, is that canonical Mark dismembered Secret Mark's story of the young man's resurrection and initiation so that only Mark 14:51–52 residually evidenced the initiation and Mark 16:1–8 residually evidenced the resurrection. Thus, for example, the “tomb” in Mark 16:2, 3, 5, 8 comes from the “tomb” in Secret Mark 1v26; 2rl, 2, 6; “who will roll away the stone for us from the door of the tomb” in Mark 16:3 comes from “rolled away the stone from the door of of the tomb” in Secret Mark 2r1–2; and, especially, the “young man” in the tomb in Mark 16:5 comes from the “young man” in the tomb in Secret Mark 2r3,4,6. But that raises a question I did not realize earlier (1976; 1988a:283–284). When you remove those elements, what is actually left for a conclusion to Secret Mark? How did Secret Mark, the first version of Mark's Gospel, actually end? If the young man in the tomb was created by canonical Mark, what was there before that creation? Did Secret Mark conclude with ...
Read more